google.com, pub-5348167154863511, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0 Snitchlady: Why Military Security Experts Know That Arming All Troops Is Not the Answer

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Why Military Security Experts Know That Arming All Troops Is Not the Answer

Placeholder Image

Most armed service members are not trained to neutralize active shooters, and putting more loaded guns in their hands creates its own risks.

The argument that all military service members should be armed with guns to protect themselves — proffered by GOP presidential candidates Jeb Bush, Scott Walker, and Donald Trump in the wake of the shooting deaths of four Marines and a sailor last week in Chattanooga, Tennessee — is so basic that there’s not much argument to it at all. Railing against “gun-free zones” last Friday, Trump summed the case up in this way: “This sick guy had guns and shot them down. These are decorated people. These are people who could have handled guns very easily. They would have had a good chance if they had a gun.” In making their cases, the presidential hopefuls echoed a Connecticut car repairman whose shop is near a military recruiting office, who told the Associated Press that arming its occupants made perfect sense to him. “Most of them are trained infantrymen,” the repairman asserted. “That definitely would make it a lot more safe.” They’re military, they know how to use guns, how could we not have every one of them be armed all the time, just in case?
READ MORE